Casiel
05-19 06:15 PM
first entry...so I'm a bit shy :c)
greets
greets
wallpaper all these eautiful women,
gcformeornot
04-09 06:24 AM
Hello Attorneys,
I am filing for renewing of EAD. I am stuck at question #15 "Current Immigration Status" My last entry was on L1B in 2007. In 2008 I changed employers and started working on EAD.
Can you please help with this.
I am filing for renewing of EAD. I am stuck at question #15 "Current Immigration Status" My last entry was on L1B in 2007. In 2008 I changed employers and started working on EAD.
Can you please help with this.
Blog Feeds
02-08 06:10 PM
In a time when the country is facing a $1.5 trillion deficit and the antis are calling for massive increases in spending on immigration enforcement, it's nice to see someone calling out the immigration prosecutors for what is a huge waste of taxpayer dollars. From the Austin American-Statesman: In an order filed Friday, a federal judge in Austin questioned U.S. prosecutors for seeking criminal convictions in court against some illegal immigrants, writing that the practice "presents a cost to the American taxpayer ... that is neither meritorious nor reasonable." The order by U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks comes as his...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/02/judge-stop-wasting-taxpayer-money-prosecuting-immigration-offenses.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/02/judge-stop-wasting-taxpayer-money-prosecuting-immigration-offenses.html)
2011 Beautiful Retro Updo Hairstyle
Blog Feeds
06-11 07:20 PM
Harry Reid says he's got 60 votes to support an immigration reform bill. That's a pretty confident tone he's taking and I hope he's right. And for those of you who say that you don't have provisions in the bill helping your group - particularly employment immigration advocates - I'll remind you that the immigration reform bill is what is standing in the way of many other bills moving forward. Once it is passed, we should be back in a normal environment where other problems can be more easily addressed.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/reid-weve-got-the-votes-now-for-immigration-reform.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/reid-weve-got-the-votes-now-for-immigration-reform.html)
more...
BEC_fog
01-17 03:18 PM
I guess u are talking about changing your monthly contribution to IV. You can cancel your current contribution and sign up for monthly contribution again with the new card.
kirupa
10-31 06:24 AM
The image's size seems to be too large. Please use the size provided in the template :)
more...
jonty_11
06-21 05:23 PM
You will get RFE from USCIS if u have not taken all necessary veccinations.and u will have to take them then...
2010 North Korea
california
04-22 06:14 AM
w3schools is very helpful for you..
more...
munnu77
01-14 03:30 PM
My H1-B renewal application was approved last month.
Still an agent came from USCIS last week for site inspection. He talked to HR first, then came to my room. ASked for an photo id, then asked usual questions, job responsibilities, salary, location,
educational qualifications, salary statement...
took some fotos of my room and desk b4 he left.
Everything went on for 15 mints.
Thought, I should share this info with you.
Thank you
Still an agent came from USCIS last week for site inspection. He talked to HR first, then came to my room. ASked for an photo id, then asked usual questions, job responsibilities, salary, location,
educational qualifications, salary statement...
took some fotos of my room and desk b4 he left.
Everything went on for 15 mints.
Thought, I should share this info with you.
Thank you
hair Italian Women: Sexy, Beautiful
aebuddy
10-12 09:04 AM
I Dont Get The File Type, I Mean It wouldn't let me put it in flash but im dumb so...what can i do w/ it, by the way, i just got it yesterday...
more...
Blog Feeds
11-08 08:50 AM
May of you may be familiar with Professor Vivek Wadhwa from his columns in BusinessWeek and his major papers published on skilled worker immigration. I got to meet Professor Wadhwa when we both spoke at an ImmigrationWorksUSA conference a few months back. He gave a very informative presentation using the slides I'm attaching. Professor Wadhwa kindly agreed to let me publish them on my blog so readers could benefit. Many thanks Professor Wadhwa. Wadhwa presentation
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/11/wadhwa-presentation-americas-loss-is-the-worlds-gain.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/11/wadhwa-presentation-americas-loss-is-the-worlds-gain.html)
hot Filed under: Beautiful Women
ngopalak
01-01 08:49 AM
Wishing you all a very happy and prosperous new year!
more...
house quot;Here in South Korea,
anilsal
06-14 04:48 PM
That EAD is different as far as I know. Probably they are referring to another I-765
tattoo from North Korea. from Mexico
neel_gump
07-07 11:11 AM
Form AR-11 asks for the date my stay in the United States will expire. What date should I use? Currently, I am on working on EAD (I-485 pending) and last entered US on AP.
more...
pictures Into The Beautiful North,
Blog Feeds
04-29 02:10 PM
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlD4DxkjBBLdskhxDsjdcx2kGOPJQXS35l_9JeR6p72h2lbsP3JYb82LVmZb37I1fk0IUYdWUB1Uq274dGqnq4lDPENjISQxigzUXvbZ70UKTn8xZbYtmnMorsAZbilc8rrutMsWxpuCq_/s200/abacus.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlD4DxkjBBLdskhxDsjdcx2kGOPJQXS35l_9JeR6p72h2lbsP3JYb82LVmZb37I1fk0IUYdWUB1Uq274dGqnq4lDPENjISQxigzUXvbZ70UKTn8xZbYtmnMorsAZbilc8rrutMsWxpuCq_/s1600/abacus.jpg)
As of April 22, 2010, USCIS had received just over 16,000 cases against the regular H-1B cap and 6,739 cases against the Master's degree cap.
USCIS provides regular updates on the processing of FY2011 H-1B petitions. The updates can be found on the USCIS� website here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=4b7cdd1d5fd37210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=73566811264a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60a RCRD).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-4013860618767567056?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2010/04/2011-h-1b-cap-count-updated.html)
As of April 22, 2010, USCIS had received just over 16,000 cases against the regular H-1B cap and 6,739 cases against the Master's degree cap.
USCIS provides regular updates on the processing of FY2011 H-1B petitions. The updates can be found on the USCIS� website here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=4b7cdd1d5fd37210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=73566811264a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60a RCRD).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-4013860618767567056?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2010/04/2011-h-1b-cap-count-updated.html)
dresses for eautiful women holds
gregspirited
02-22 03:45 PM
Below is my current GC & H1-B status
1. Have an approved I-140 with my current employer. Waiting to file I-485.
2. Pending H1-B extension petition based on approved I-140
I'm looking to move from engineering to marketing with the same employer. I know I have to refile labor and I-140 and claim the PD based on the already approved I-140. Can I move to marketing from engineering? The job responsibilities are totally different and my current H1-B extension petition is for engineering position only. I need to file for a H1-B amendment based on the new marketing position.
Will i be able to move smoothly within my current company. If not what will be some roadblocks? Any advice or insights is highly appreciated
1. Have an approved I-140 with my current employer. Waiting to file I-485.
2. Pending H1-B extension petition based on approved I-140
I'm looking to move from engineering to marketing with the same employer. I know I have to refile labor and I-140 and claim the PD based on the already approved I-140. Can I move to marketing from engineering? The job responsibilities are totally different and my current H1-B extension petition is for engineering position only. I need to file for a H1-B amendment based on the new marketing position.
Will i be able to move smoothly within my current company. If not what will be some roadblocks? Any advice or insights is highly appreciated
more...
makeup north korean women army.
Macaca
07-28 04:46 PM
Reid Eyes Rules Changes To Restrict Amendments (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_10/news/19488-1.html) By Emily Pierce, ROLL CALL STAFF, July 23, 2007
After nearly seven months of battling Republican filibusters and controversial amendments on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Friday he may seek to change Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor.
Reid said Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would be tasked with exploring what rules changes should be made.
Noting that there has been a "growing breakdown between the majority and minority in terms of how to get things done," Howard Gantman, Feinstein's chief of staff for the Rules panel, said the committee would conduct a "comprehensive review" and look at the rules on the germaneness of amendments and how long Senators have to review proposals before voting on them.
"Sen. Feinstein is very serious about looking at the vast range of amendments that are brought in at the last minute that are not germane," said Gantman. He added that the panel's focus would be on "how to better get things done."
Reid spokesman Jim Manley cautioned that Reid "has no intention of unilaterally seeking a rules change."
However, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) scoffed at the notion of limiting or restricting Senators' ability to offer amendments, which he likened to freedom of speech.
"Look, nobody's going to shut anybody up in the Senate," he said at a press conference Friday. "There's going to be robust debate. You can just write that down. And I understand Sen. Reid's frustrations, but we're not going to establish any speech police in the Senate - not now, not ever."
Reid apparently reached his boiling point Thursday night when Republicans used Senate budget rules to offer a number of non-germane amendments to a student loan financing bill.
"What went on last night was ridiculous," Reid said on the Senate floor. "We should change those rules. ... We will have to take a look at that."
Reid said Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) managed the student loan measure "very well until it ran into the rule that we have here that allows unending amendments on any subject forever, literally, before you get to final passage."
Because the higher education bill - by virtue of its status as a budget reconciliation measure - was immune to filibuster, Senate rules permitted unlimited amendments to be offered and voted on. On Thursday night, in particular, Senators were given only a few minutes to review the substance of some amendments before they were asked to vote on them.
As is customary with budget and reconciliation measures, Senators engaged in a long series of back-to-back votes, known as a "vote-a-rama," at the end of the debate. But Democrats said Republicans' insistence on having 14 non-germane votes - including six related to cutting taxes, three related to immigration and two related to terrorism - was excessive.
When Democrats pushed back with their own non-germane amendment expressing the Senate's opinion that President Bush should not pardon Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, Republicans tried to force a vote on former President Bill Clinton's controversial pardons.
But before the Senate could vote on that, Reid asked that both the Libby vote and the GOP pardons amendment be stricken from the Congressional Record, and the chamber voted on final passage of the bill.
Manley explained: "These so-called vote-a-ramas are bad for the system, and they may lead to bad policy. As have leaders in the past, all Sen. Reid was doing was expressing his frustration at the Republicans' desire to score cheap political points at the expense of a good-faith effort to pass a bill that will make college education more affordable for more Americans."
Even though Reid is seeking a Rules panel review, the rules governing Thursday night's debate actually fall under the Congressional Budget Act. If Reid were to seek a change in the Budget Act, the Senate would have to pass legislation and it would have to be signed into law by the president.
However, changes to Senate rules require 67 votes to pass.
After nearly seven months of battling Republican filibusters and controversial amendments on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Friday he may seek to change Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor.
Reid said Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would be tasked with exploring what rules changes should be made.
Noting that there has been a "growing breakdown between the majority and minority in terms of how to get things done," Howard Gantman, Feinstein's chief of staff for the Rules panel, said the committee would conduct a "comprehensive review" and look at the rules on the germaneness of amendments and how long Senators have to review proposals before voting on them.
"Sen. Feinstein is very serious about looking at the vast range of amendments that are brought in at the last minute that are not germane," said Gantman. He added that the panel's focus would be on "how to better get things done."
Reid spokesman Jim Manley cautioned that Reid "has no intention of unilaterally seeking a rules change."
However, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) scoffed at the notion of limiting or restricting Senators' ability to offer amendments, which he likened to freedom of speech.
"Look, nobody's going to shut anybody up in the Senate," he said at a press conference Friday. "There's going to be robust debate. You can just write that down. And I understand Sen. Reid's frustrations, but we're not going to establish any speech police in the Senate - not now, not ever."
Reid apparently reached his boiling point Thursday night when Republicans used Senate budget rules to offer a number of non-germane amendments to a student loan financing bill.
"What went on last night was ridiculous," Reid said on the Senate floor. "We should change those rules. ... We will have to take a look at that."
Reid said Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) managed the student loan measure "very well until it ran into the rule that we have here that allows unending amendments on any subject forever, literally, before you get to final passage."
Because the higher education bill - by virtue of its status as a budget reconciliation measure - was immune to filibuster, Senate rules permitted unlimited amendments to be offered and voted on. On Thursday night, in particular, Senators were given only a few minutes to review the substance of some amendments before they were asked to vote on them.
As is customary with budget and reconciliation measures, Senators engaged in a long series of back-to-back votes, known as a "vote-a-rama," at the end of the debate. But Democrats said Republicans' insistence on having 14 non-germane votes - including six related to cutting taxes, three related to immigration and two related to terrorism - was excessive.
When Democrats pushed back with their own non-germane amendment expressing the Senate's opinion that President Bush should not pardon Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, Republicans tried to force a vote on former President Bill Clinton's controversial pardons.
But before the Senate could vote on that, Reid asked that both the Libby vote and the GOP pardons amendment be stricken from the Congressional Record, and the chamber voted on final passage of the bill.
Manley explained: "These so-called vote-a-ramas are bad for the system, and they may lead to bad policy. As have leaders in the past, all Sen. Reid was doing was expressing his frustration at the Republicans' desire to score cheap political points at the expense of a good-faith effort to pass a bill that will make college education more affordable for more Americans."
Even though Reid is seeking a Rules panel review, the rules governing Thursday night's debate actually fall under the Congressional Budget Act. If Reid were to seek a change in the Budget Act, the Senate would have to pass legislation and it would have to be signed into law by the president.
However, changes to Senate rules require 67 votes to pass.
girlfriend Filed under: Beautiful Women
glus
04-18 12:15 PM
hello,
Unfortunately a person with a pending form I-130 is not eligible to receive a work authorization. I-130 itself does not give you the legal authority to USCIS to issue a work permit. It is possible to get a work authorization if such a person has a pending I-485 (Adjustment of status) or is in other valid immigration status that would allow him / her to get work authorization.
Hope this helps?
Unfortunately a person with a pending form I-130 is not eligible to receive a work authorization. I-130 itself does not give you the legal authority to USCIS to issue a work permit. It is possible to get a work authorization if such a person has a pending I-485 (Adjustment of status) or is in other valid immigration status that would allow him / her to get work authorization.
Hope this helps?
hairstyles most eautiful women.
sumansk
11-28 12:14 PM
Hi All,
I have come across situation where people who primarily filed 485 to NSC and their cases have been transferred to Texas or other places. In their notices the receipt date has been mentioned as the date on which the case received later by another service(TSC, CSC etc) center and not the date on which the case was first received by NSC.
So technically it is not the fault of the applcant and in some cases they lose 3 or more months for AC21.
Can someone or moderators explain if one can argue with USCIS to put the receipt date as the original for AC21 considerations.
:mad:
Thanks & Regards
I have come across situation where people who primarily filed 485 to NSC and their cases have been transferred to Texas or other places. In their notices the receipt date has been mentioned as the date on which the case received later by another service(TSC, CSC etc) center and not the date on which the case was first received by NSC.
So technically it is not the fault of the applcant and in some cases they lose 3 or more months for AC21.
Can someone or moderators explain if one can argue with USCIS to put the receipt date as the original for AC21 considerations.
:mad:
Thanks & Regards
needhelp!
02-04 07:10 PM
We have a law firm that helps us with IV: thawerlaw.com
The immigration attorney is Kimberly Kinser. She did a live Q&A session for our members. I don't have case experience from them, but I know they are good people. :)
The immigration attorney is Kimberly Kinser. She did a live Q&A session for our members. I don't have case experience from them, but I know they are good people. :)
sukhwinderd
12-10 10:23 AM
lawmakers are so anxious to legalize illegals. they will bring seperate bill to legalize parents.
No comments:
Post a Comment