Wednesday, June 8, 2011

corazones y amor_16

corazones y amor_16. theme park rides.
  • theme park rides.


  • DSJ
    07-06 12:35 PM
    new from Aila.org

    July 2, 2007, State Department Notice to USCIS Regarding EB Visa Availability

    Has anybody got more info on this.




    corazones y amor_16. vanessa hudgens yellow dress.
  • vanessa hudgens yellow dress.


  • chanduv23
    05-18 03:39 PM
    ANOTHER UPDATE

    I just spoke to Congressional office and this is what she has to say:

    Quote"""""""""""

    I just spoke with our liaison at the Nebraska office and she confirmed that your motion to reopen was approved on Friday (05/15/2009). That, I am told, means Nebraska agrees to re-examine your I-485 denial and a decision should be forthcoming within 60 days. I suggest that we wait to see what that decision is before our office initiates any formal inquiries with the USCIS Nebraska Director.

    """"""""""""""Unquote

    But she agreed that my second MTR might have been on sidelines and the congressional office inquiry into the matter could have influenced USCIS to review my case ( probably with a supervisor) immediately. She told me that she would put another inquiry with NSC in 4 weeks if nothing comes up. Finally we have decided to forgo (just for now) the process of writing letter to the NSC Director as it might not add much weight to the process, as congressional office would be repeating the same argument that my Attorney has made regarding the AC21, which a supervisor is already looking at.

    I have already waited for 3 months. Another 2 months might take its toll on my emotional drain.

    God save AC21............

    That is a standard message. Basically yur 485 has been reopened. Unless your priority date is current there is nothing much they can do, but if there is a need for RFE, they will send you RFE.

    Congratulations. This is a standard message your case has been reopened. You must celebrate this moment.

    Unless your MTR is approved, your case does not get reopened. So your MTR is also approved - usually they do not update those messages on the online system properly and thats why we do not see them.




    corazones y amor_16. mortal kombat 9 jade
  • mortal kombat 9 jade


  • green_world
    09-12 07:28 PM
    First time contribution of $100...

    Good work IV..

    Order Details - Sep 12, 2007 19:50 GMT-04:00
    Google Order #510095991304725




    corazones y amor_16. of the following integer
  • of the following integer


  • surabhi
    07-18 05:45 PM
    Set up for $50 recurring contribution. Never in my life did I felt so charged up as I did in last few days. Thank you IV for inspiring.

    I feel there is value to creating atleast "paid members only" section in addition to regular free zone, so that quality of dicussion is elevated.



    more...

    corazones y amor_16. more.
  • more.


  • RaviG
    06-25 03:10 PM
    Since I am sure that my GC will take 5 to 10 years more. Meanwhile too many things will change that might make me go back home. So I decided to invest in home(India). I sold lot of stocks. Stopped contributing to 401K above employers match (I used to contribute full 15K). Deferred buying house until my 140 approved.

    I am at a life stage where I have enough experience and tendency to take risks (married but no kids etc...). If I have flexibility of not working, I want to invest my time in a small startup. Working/investing a start-up means I might go out of status anytime. So I decided not to try any of those. Its a loss for me as well as for economy. If I accumulate enough money I might go home and try to do something like startup or small business. It would be good for US and me if they let me do it here.

    In essence I am loosing the oppurtunity and by restricting my career US is loosing an oppurtunity to create more jobs.




    corazones y amor_16. more ed miliband wallace.
  • more ed miliband wallace.


  • coopheal
    03-09 05:58 PM
    Added info about April VB to past VBs table.
    http://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/Past_Visa_Bulletin_Data

    The way dates are moved doesn't seem to have any fact based intelligent logic.



    more...

    corazones y amor_16. more.
  • more.


  • eager_immi
    07-18 04:22 PM
    I love the idea of monthly subscription website what does the core think. This works just like AILA does.

    I know many of friends who use IV as recourse for NEWS but they don't register nor contribute. Even after multiple reminders and sarcastic comments they don't. I feel pity for them, they don't understand by registering and contributing they help them self and others. Shouldn�t we make IV a monthly subscription web site? That way we will have only serious members.




    corazones y amor_16. more morena baccarin fotos.
  • more morena baccarin fotos.


  • sunny1000
    04-30 05:35 PM
    atleast there was bipartisan frustration on part of congressmen on both sides except for the king guy

    Yeah, King is like that crazy Tancredo...



    more...

    corazones y amor_16. more.
  • more.


  • pappu
    12-16 01:32 PM
    its been stuck at 2001 for so many years , except for 2007 july bulletin fiasco.

    with the way things are , it can take 10 more years for EB3 to even get to 2005. Lets try and push for something which works in this country.

    Buy a house get a GC! rule for EB applicants.

    Maybe you want to start a thread and collect all those who are stuck in 2001 and earlier dates in EB3 I and 2003 and earlier for EB2I on IV.

    Lets see how many we get. They should also update the IV tracker with their dates. We can then use that data to ask help clear the backlog and petition to advance dates in a systematic order. This will work if you can get many people who are stuck despite their dates being current for several months/years. What do you think?




    corazones y amor_16. kristen
  • kristen


  • Aah_GC
    06-10 10:09 AM
    My suggestion - Do your best to support IV - contribute and make those calls. Rest: Leave it to the man above - and move on with your priorities.



    more...

    corazones y amor_16. more.
  • more.


  • paisa
    07-06 03:23 PM
    --- Good one :D
    you mean 60k




    corazones y amor_16. Jennifer Lopez Messy Half Up
  • Jennifer Lopez Messy Half Up


  • arung
    12-12 10:55 AM
    I got financing using EAD in March 2010, and got refinancing recently still using EAD but not the WFC. There should no criteria or need to have GC only. Talk to agent or other lender and you need one, "DESI company" let me know.



    more...

    corazones y amor_16. more.
  • more.


  • kaisersose
    06-10 12:04 PM
    One word answer:

    Y2K

    So AC21 and visa recapture happened without anyone trying for it.


    They increased quota of H1B, did AC21 because it was a market demand.
    Now the economy is down, there are elections, jobless rate is high............ so think why will they increase h1B quota or greencard quota? What is the incentive for government?

    I have always held that asking for quota increase is a bad idea and will not happen.

    Visa recapture is the best bet and even that appears to be a hassle as there are many factions opposing it.




    corazones y amor_16. more Helena Bonham Carter.
  • more Helena Bonham Carter.


  • yoda
    09-12 12:18 PM
    Pick whatever you like and feel comfortable with. Post it here so we know.

    I will work on Washington Post and New York Times. Then, I will work on Associated Press and Reuters.

    gsc999 and Franklin should work on Mercury News and San Francisco Chronicle. I think they have a DC office.

    First, I have to come up with a sexy letter!

    If you are considering national media, please cover Boston Globe as well. I was about to coordinate this with the MA team, but if you can do this, please let us know.



    more...

    corazones y amor_16. volkswagen jetta 2011 black.
  • volkswagen jetta 2011 black.


  • fightforit
    04-30 03:06 PM
    I faced a similar response when I called Senator Scott Brown's office. His staff member categorically stated that he is against amnesty, but is 'sympathetic' to the cause of legal immigrants. I explained that as members of IV, we are working towards legal immigration reform since the process is stagnant (without trying to diss illegal immigrants). Its an awkward situation trying to separate the two...but I think we really need to.
    However, my greatest fear is that even though legal immigration reform may garner bi-partisan support, who in Congress will take it up on its own if CIR gets shot down?? Legal immigrants are in much smaller numbers than illegal ones..and will anybody take up our cause without the other?




    corazones y amor_16. decimals number line. on a
  • decimals number line. on a


  • MahaBharatGC
    09-27 08:54 AM
    Arrived before the Millennium: Dec 1999
    Started GC processing in 2003 finally filed in March/Apr 2004.
    2007 lucky fiasco gave me and my wife chance on EAD.
    Still counting....:confused:



    more...

    corazones y amor_16. mapa europa fisico. mapa de
  • mapa europa fisico. mapa de


  • guy03062
    03-08 09:47 AM
    Please keep posting!




    corazones y amor_16. more.
  • more.


  • snathan
    02-09 10:28 PM
    Lets make the EB2 date to 28 Dec 05..tthat will cover my PD :D:D:D

    For that you have to donate.

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=23597&page=1000




    corazones y amor_16. pink hair anime character.
  • pink hair anime character.


  • srini1976
    07-11 09:44 AM
    Congrats to all the IV EB2 members who will benefit from the Aug Visa Bulletin. I am so happy for them.

    Will it move beyond June 2006 for EB2 India in September 2008 Bulletin?




    Milind123
    09-15 08:30 AM
    thanks Zappy pvhemanth :)

    Thank you Zappy & pvhemanth for the very nice contribution. I thought you would come after our three sponsors have pledged. That was really nice of you.

    May I now request contributions from the people who have contributed only once? If you have contributed some time back please consider doing so now.
    Also, if you have contributed before and do not plan to contribute now, we would like to know the reason? There is obviously some disillusionment. If you don't feel comfortable posting, feel free to send out a PM. We will try our best to address your concerns. Remember your contribution before the rally is slightly more beneficial for IV.




    pappu
    08-12 10:55 AM
    Senate Passage of Border Security Legislation

    August 12, 2010

    Today, I come to the floor to seek unanimous consent to pass a smart, tough, and effective $600 million bill that will significantly enhance the security and integrity of our nation’s southern border—which currently lacks the resources needed to fully combat the drug smugglers, gun-runners, human-traffickers, money launderers and other organized criminals that seek to do harm to innocent Americans along our border….

    The best part of this border package, Mr. President, is that it is fully paid for and does not increase the deficit by a single penny. In actuality, the Congressional Budget Office has determined that this bill will yield a direct savings to taxpayers of $50 million….

    The emergency border funds we are passing today are fully paid for by assessing fees on certain types of companies who hire foreign workers using certain types of visas in a way that Congress did not intend. I want to take a moment to explain exactly what we are doing in this bill a little further because I want everyone to clearly understand how these offsets are designed.

    In 1990, Congress realized that the world was changing rapidly and that technological innovations like the internet were creating a high demand in the United States for high-tech workers to create new technologies and products. Consequently, Congress created the H-1B visa program to allow U.S. employers to hire foreign tech workers in special circumstances when they could not find an American citizen who was qualified for the job.

    Many of the companies that use this program today are using the program in the exact way Congress intended. That is, these companies (like Microsoft, IBM, and Intel) are hiring bright foreign students educated in our American universities to work in the U.S. for 6 or 7 years to invent new product lines and technologies so that Microsoft, IBM, and Intel can sell more products to the American public. Then—at the expiration of the H-1B visa period—these companies apply for these talented workers to earn green cards and stay with the company.

    When the H-1B visa program is used in this manner, it is a good program for everyone involved. It is good for the company. It is good for the worker. And it is good for the American people who benefit from the products and jobs created by the innovation of the H-1B visa holder.

    Every day, companies like Oracle, Cisco, Apple and others use the H-1B visa program in the exact way I have just described—and their use of the program has greatly benefitted this country.

    But recently, some companies have decided to exploit an unintended loophole in the H-1B visa program to use the program in a manner that many in Congress, including myself, do not believe is consistent with the program’s intent.

    Rather than being a company that makes something, and simply needs to bring in a talented foreign worker to help innovate and create new products and technologies—these other companies are essentially creating “multinational temp agencies” that were never contemplated when the H-1B program was created.

    The business model of these newer companies is not to make any new products or technologies like Microsoft or Apple does. Instead, their business model is to bring foreign tech workers into the United States who are willing to accept less pay than their American counterparts, place these workers into other companies in exchange for a “consulting fee,” and transfer these workers from company to company in order to maximize profits from placement fees. In other words, these companies are petitioning for foreign workers simply to then turn around and provide these same workers to other companies who need cheap labor for various short term projects.

    Don’t take my word for it. If you look at the marketing materials of some of the companies that fall within the scope covered by today’s legislation, their materials boast about their “outsourcing expertise” and say that their advantage is their ability to conduct what they call “labor arbitrage” which is—in their own words—“transferring work functions to a lower cost environment for increased savings.”

    The business model used by these companies within the United States is creating three major negative side effects. First, it is ruining the reputation of the H-1B program, which is overwhelmingly used by good actors for beneficial purposes. Second, according to the Economic Policy institute, it is lowering the wages for American tech workers already in the marketplace. Third, it is also discouraging many of our smartest students from entering the technology industry in the first place. Students can see that paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for advanced schooling is not worth the cost when the market is being flooded with foreign temporary workers willing to do tech-work for far less pay because their foreign education was much cheaper and they intend to move back home when their visa expires to a country where the cost of living is far less expensive.

    This type of use of the H-1B visa program will be addressed as part of comprehensive immigration reform and will likely be dramatically restricted. We will be reforming the legal immigration system to encourage the world’s best and brightest individuals to come to the United States and create the new technologies and businesses that will employ countless American workers, but will discourage businesses from using our immigration laws as a means to obtain temporary and less-expensive foreign labor to replace capable American workers.

    Nevertheless, I do wish to clarify a previous mischaracterization of these firms, where I labeled them as “chop shops.” That statement was incorrect, and I wish to acknowledge that. In the tech industry, these firms are sometimes known as “body shops” and that’s what I should have said.

    While I strongly oppose the manner in which these firms are using the H-1B visa to accomplish objectives that Congress never intended, it would be unfortunate if anyone concluded from my remarks that these firms are engaging in illegal behavior.

    But I also want to make clear that the purpose of this fee is not to target businesses from any particular country. Many news articles have reported that the only companies that will be affected by this fee are companies based in India and that, ipso facto, the purpose of this legislation must be to target Indian IT companies.

    Well, it is simply untrue that the purpose of this legislation is to target Indian companies. We are simply raising fees for businesses who use the H-1B visa to do things that are contrary to the program’s original intent.

    Visa fees will only increase for companies with more than 50 workers who continue to employ more than 50 percent of their employees through the H-1B program. Congress does not want the H-1B visa program to be a vehicle for creating multinational temp agencies where workers do not know what projects they will be working on—or what cities they will be working in—when they enter the country.

    The fee is based solely upon the business model of the company, not the location of the company.

    If you are using the H-1B visa to innovate new products and technologies for your own company to sell, that is a good thing regardless of whether the company was originally founded in India, Ireland, or Indiana.

    But if you are using the H-1B visa to run a glorified international temp agency for tech workers in contravention of the spirit of the program, I and my colleagues believe that you should have to pay a higher fee to ensure that American workers are not losing their jobs because of unintended uses of the visa program that were never contemplated when the program was created.

    This belief is consistent regardless of whether the company using these staffing practices was founded in Bangalore, Beijing, or Boston.

    Raising the fees for companies hiring more than 50 percent of their workforce through foreign visas will accomplish two important goals. First, it will provide the necessary funds to secure our border without raising taxes or adding to the deficit. Second, it will level the playing field for American workers so that they do not lose out on good jobs here in America because it is cheaper to bring in a foreign worker rather than hire an American worker.

    Let me tell you what objective folks around the world are saying about the impact of this fee increase. In an August 6, 2010, Wall Street Journal article, Avinash Vashistha—the CEO of a Bangalore based off-shoring advisory consulting firm—told the Journal that the new fee in this bill “would accelerate Indian firms’ plans to hire more American-born workers in the U.S.” What’s wrong with that? In an August 7, 2010 Economic Times Article, Jeya Kumar, a CEO of a top IT company, said that this bill would “erode cost arbitrage and cause a change in the operational model of Indian offshore providers.”

    The leaders of this business model are agreeing that our bill will make it more expensive to bring in foreign tech workers to compete with American tech workers for jobs here in America. That means these companies are going to start having to hire U.S. tech workers again.

    So Mr. President, this bill is not only a responsible border security bill, it has the dual advantage of creating more high-paying American jobs.

    Finally, Mr. President, I want to be clear about one other thing. Even though passing this bill will secure our border, I again say that the only way to fully restore the rule of law to our entire immigration system is by passing comprehensive immigration reform….

    The urgency for immigration reform cannot be overstated because it is so overdue. The time for excuses is now over, it is now time to get to work.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment